Send us a message to let us know how can we help you.
All enquiries will be answered within 48hrs by one of Arkas Laws specialist Housing Disrepair lawyers.
Look: the Gambling Commission draws a line in the sand and calls out any title that pretends to be “skill-based” while it’s really just a slot in disguise. The rulebook says “games of chance” get a higher tax bite, “games of skill” get the sweet spot. That’s the core of the mess.
Here is the deal: roulette, craps, and the classic fruit machines are pure luck. No matter how slick the graphics, the outcome is dictated by RNGs. Those are automatically counted as “chance” and they trigger the higher contribution rate. By contrast, poker, blackjack, and certain video-poker variants let you influence the result with strategy, timing, and bet sizing. Those slip into the skill-category and shave a few percentage points off your levy.
And here is why many operators get their wires crossed. Games like “loot-box” shooters or “battle-royale” slots blend RNG drops with player choice. The regulator looks at the dominant factor. If the RNG decides the prize 70% of the time, it’s a chance game. If skill decides the outcome 60% of the time, it’s a skill game. The split isn’t a guess; it’s a statistical test you must run on your own data.
First, gather a massive sample – thousands of sessions, not a handful. Then, run a regression analysis linking player decisions (bet size, timing, card play) to win rate. If the correlation coefficient tops .4, you’ve got a skill claim. Next, document the methodology in a PDF and send it to the commission. They love paperwork. Finally, update your game description to highlight the strategic layers – “players can influence outcomes with timing and bet management.” That’s the language that moves the needle.
Don’t reinvent the wheel. The which games count full guide UK breaks down each title, the exact percentage you’ll pay, and the evidence the commission demands. Use it as a checklist, not a bedtime story.
Spin-based slots → 15% contribution.
Card-based poker → 10% contribution.
Hybrid loot-boxes → 12% until proven otherwise.
Live dealer blackjack → 9% if you can prove player decision impact.
Bottom line: run the stats, file the proof, rename the UI if needed, and watch the tax bill shrink. Get your compliance officer on board now and start re-classifying those borderline games before the next fiscal quarter rolls around. Act on this today.
Further information – DOWNLOAD THE ARKAS LAW BROCHURE
Leave a Reply